[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       autoconf
Subject:    Re: Will autoconf work with -Werror=implicit-int and -Werror=implicit-function-declaration ?
From:       Sam James <sam () gentoo ! org>
Date:       2023-12-13 19:57:35
Message-ID: 87msudc1t4.fsf () gentoo ! org
[Download RAW message or body]


Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> writes:

> * Zack Weinberg:
>
>> Paul Eggert made some changes back in May that attempt to address this:
>> commits 028526149ee804617a302ccef22cc6adbda681b0 and
>> 33c26d2700f927432c756ccf7a4fc89403d35b95.  Do you have a minimized
>> test case for the problem (both the original problem and any remaining
>> issues you're aware of are useful to me)?
>
> The latest installment of this issue is here:
>
>   configure.ac: Define _DEFAULT_SOURCE along with _XOPEN_SOURCE
>   <https://github.com/samtools/htslib/pull/1711>
>
> I wasn't aware of this change from
> 33c26d2700f927432c756ccf7a4fc89403d35b95 ("Fix port of AC_FUNC_MMAP"),
> or maybe I just forgot about it:
>
> +#ifndef getpagesize
> +# ifdef _SC_PAGESIZE
> +#  define getpagesize() sysconf (_SC_PAGESIZE)
> +# elif defined _SC_PAGE_SIZE
> +#  define getpagesize() sysconf (_SC_PAGE_SIZE)
> +# elif HAVE_GETPAGESIZE
> +int getpagesize ();
> +# else
>
> This should indeed isolate this test from the outcome of the getpagesize
> check because it now prefers sysconf.

Thanks for raising this one - Zack had asked me for any outstanding
issues and I had something like this in the back of my head but couldn't
yet find a good summary.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]