[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       autoconf
Subject:    Re: Possible bug in many acspecific tests under AC_LANG(C++)
From:       Paul Eggert <eggert () twinsun ! com>
Date:       2002-05-29 21:21:56
Message-ID: 200205292121.g4TLLul06911 () shade ! twinsun ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

> From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
> Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 18:37:00 +0200 (CEST)
> 
> > 	  return $ac_func != 0;
> 
> This doesn't work in C++ if the function is overloaded.

OK, but doesn't the current AC_CHECK_FUNC have that problem already?
And likewise for AC_REPLACE_FUNCS, AC_CHECK_DECL, etc.?

It would be nice to add support for overloaded functions, but I
suspect it won't be trivial.  In the meantime, it would be nice to fix
the tests for ordinary (non-overloaded) functions.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]