[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: asterisk-users
Subject: [asterisk-users] new inbound DID provider... no auth?
From: Jeff LaCoursiere <jeff () jeff ! net>
Date: 2016-11-30 21:10:51
Message-ID: 3eae3192-66a8-ede9-7027-434bf6607767 () jeff ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
We are trying to work with a new DID provider and I find myself
confused. Their standard integration is to send the call with no
authentication. I am expected to whitelist all their possible gateways,
and accept their calls I guess with no peer definition. I actually have
it working this way; the calls land in our "public" context, I guess as
"guest", and I am able to route them from there. But that makes me nervous.
I would rather at least have them be associated with a defined peer, so
I can set the right context and any other parameters I might want
associated. It is inbound only, no outbound. I might try to set a
host= in a peer definition with no secret, and see if that matches it,
but I would rather avoid making a peer definition for every gateway they
have. Can anyone think of a way to define a single peer that might show
from multiple potential addresses without authentication info?
Cheers,
--
Jeff LaCoursiere
312 962 5250 desk
815 546 6599 cell
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
Check out the new Asterisk community forum at: https://community.asterisk.org/
New to Asterisk? Start here:
https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic