[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       asterisk-users
Subject:    [asterisk-users] new inbound DID provider... no auth?
From:       Jeff LaCoursiere <jeff () jeff ! net>
Date:       2016-11-30 21:10:51
Message-ID: 3eae3192-66a8-ede9-7027-434bf6607767 () jeff ! net
[Download RAW message or body]


We are trying to work with a new DID provider and I find myself 
confused.  Their standard integration is to send the call with no 
authentication.  I am expected to whitelist all their possible gateways, 
and accept their calls I guess with no peer definition.  I actually have 
it working this way; the calls land in our "public" context, I guess as 
"guest", and I am able to route them from there.  But that makes me nervous.

I would rather at least have them be associated with a defined peer, so 
I can set the right context and any other parameters I might want 
associated.  It is inbound only, no outbound.  I might try to set a 
host= in a peer definition with no secret, and see if that matches it, 
but I would rather avoid making a peer definition for every gateway they 
have.  Can anyone think of a way to define a single peer that might show 
from multiple potential addresses without authentication info?

Cheers,

-- 
Jeff LaCoursiere
312 962 5250 desk
815 546 6599 cell	


-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

Check out the new Asterisk community forum at: https://community.asterisk.org/

New to Asterisk? Start here:
      https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic