[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       asterisk-dev
Subject:    Re: [asterisk-dev] Violent Objections? CDR dst/dcontext probs
From:       Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet () amorsen ! dk>
Date:       2007-06-29 11:19:41
Message-ID: m3hcor0zzm.fsf () ursa ! amorsen ! dk
[Download RAW message or body]

>>>>> "TL" == Tilghman Lesher <tilghman@mail.jeffandtilghman.com> writes:

TL> Essentially, this argument is "the standards we have come up with
TL> don't match everybody's needs, so therefore we should have no
TL> standards." I respectfully disagree, and I think the answer is, if
TL> the standard fields that we provide don't meet your needs, use
TL> other fields. Don't diminish the needs of other users to have
TL> reliable standard fields just because certain users don't use
TL> them.

If you force people to use non-standard fields, billing packages have
a lot of work ahead of them. Everyone will come up with their own
field names and maybe even formats.


/Benny



_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]