[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       asterisk-dev
Subject:    Re: [Asterisk-Dev] MGCP patch to interoperate with Cisco IAD243X
From:       "Juan J. Sierralta P." <juanjo () atmlab ! utfsm ! cl>
Date:       2003-12-21 8:31:59
Message-ID: 1071995519.11623.26.camel () balrog
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sun, 2003-12-21 at 02:57, Tilghman Lesher wrote:

> Are you used to getting your patches applied or archived on the mailing
> list archives with no action, because the guys who apply patches were
> busy at the time your patch came across the list?

	I know the guys who has CVS access use to be busy. I myself have lost
or not applied lots of patches. But one thing I really don īt tend to use
is SF bugtracker that īs why I īm asking cause on my little experience
most bugs/patches are send to -dev list with [PATCH] on the subject so
developers can filter them.

> > 	Who decides what and what doesn īt goes in mainstream Asterisk ?
> 
> Mark, as the project founder and leader, has final veto power.

	Sure. But somebody should be MGCP maintainer and Mark īs captain on that
side.
	Anyway I īll post this to bugtracker.

-- 
Juanjo sin .sig


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]