[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ast-users
Subject:    Re: [ast-users] [uwin-users]  Does ksh build under cygwin/64
From:       Irek Szczesniak <iszczesniak () gmail ! com>
Date:       2013-08-21 23:36:13
Message-ID: CALnxO54oC6Lec9h7ZxF4A6Qn9bWO+Fd9sK407=O-CfF17xAZKg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Cedric Blancher
<cedric.blancher@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21 August 2013 12:44,  <cyrille.lefevre-lists@laposte.net> wrote:
>>> Message du 09/08/13 00:42
>>> De : "Cedric Blancher"
>>>
>>> On 9 August 2013 00:15, Cyrille Lefevre
>>>  wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> > Not tried yet, but does ksh build ok under 64 bits cygwin ?
>>> > Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> Cygwin now supports 64bit binaries?
>>
>> yes, since 13 july 2013 :
>>
>> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2013-07/msg00030.html
>>
>> didn't tried since I don't have a 64-bit windows yet...
>
> yeah, great. There goes another advantage of UWIN.
>
> Seriously, someone within AT&T's management needs to receive a severe
> punishment for letting UWIN rot.

Yes to that proposal. I'm always astonished - AT&T could make real $$,
net cash far beyond self sustaining, with UWIN but instead lets it
rot.

The hard part is always to get the email of the responsible manager

Irek
_______________________________________________
ast-users mailing list
ast-users@lists.research.att.com
http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]