[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       ast-users
Subject:    [ast-users] ksh93: Can I get stderr into a pipeline
From:       M.W.Ellwood () rl ! ac ! uk (Ellwood, MW (Mike))
Date:       2005-02-11 19:51:37
Message-ID: F5839D944C66C049BDB45F4C1E3DF89D1783A3 () exchange31 ! fed ! cclrc ! ac ! uk
[Download RAW message or body]

Two kind people have pointed out that:
 
command 2>&1 | command
 
should work, and it does.
 
Don't know why I didn't think of this     (or if I did, I must have mis-typed it, originally).
 
Thanks again Andreas and Dave.
 
 
Mike
 

________________________________

From: ast-users-bounces@research.att.com on behalf of Ellwood, MW (Mike)
Sent: Sat 12/02/2005 00:19
To: ast-users@research.att.com
Subject: [ast-users] ksh93: Can I get stderr into a pipeline


I used to think this must be possible, but I haven't found a way that works:
 
Can I get the stderr from one commend into the stdin of another, in the ksh93 environment?
 
e.g.  somecommand | someothercommand
 
where both fd1 and fd2 output goes to stdin of someothercommand.
 
 
I thought that:
 
exec 2>&1     
 
...beforehand, might do the trick, but apparently not.
 
Am I missing something obvious, or is it not possible?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.research.att.com/pipermail/ast-users/attachments/20050212/8e3afaf1/attachment.htm

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]