[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       aspell-user
Subject:    Re: [Aspell-user] forbidden words
From:       Kevin Atkinson <kevina () gnu ! org>
Date:       2006-07-01 22:12:48
Message-ID: 20060701161000.P18669 () bas ! flux ! utah ! edu
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, ge wrote:

> Therefore I consider /w as a useful flag for languages, that have to 
> generate lots of word forms.
>
> FORBIDDENWORD w
> in the affix file signalizes, that in this affix file /w flag means a 
> forbidden word.
>
> The usage of /w is even broader a little bit. If there are other flags 
> together with /w, all word forms, that are created by the other flags 
> are considered as invalid, bad words.
>
> There are lots of other examples for the usefulness of the /w flag in a 
> word set. Usage of /w saves in a lot of cases additional flags, and 
> flags are a valuable, limited resource (max 255) in case of aspell.
>
> What is the behaviour of aspell, and what do you think about the above 
> mechanizm?

It is unsupported.  I might consider adding it but I am unlikely to get 
around to implementing it any time soon.  However, I will likely accept a 
patch to that effect.



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]