[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       apreq-dev
Subject:    Re: apreq -> apr-util
From:       "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe () rowe-clan ! net>
Date:       2006-07-30 6:59:32
Message-ID: 44CC58D4.3040700 () rowe-clan ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

Eli Marmor wrote:
> 
> Bill: as an insider, what do you suggest?  to start with apr-util, and
> only then integrating the other parts in httpd and mod_perl, or to try
> to do all of these projects together?

Personal opinion?  Only sane way to approach this is to take every element
that's a good, broad fit into apr-util and plug it in there (usual votes to
accept etc.)

Then take the slightly less generic, more httpd-ish and propose those into
httpd core.

That should solve the 80/20, then propose the perl glue into modperl and
voila - useful fn's for everyone, close integration, and specific modperl
connectivity where it belongs.

Bill
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic