[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: apreq-dev
Subject: Re: apreq -> apr-util
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe () rowe-clan ! net>
Date: 2006-07-30 6:59:32
Message-ID: 44CC58D4.3040700 () rowe-clan ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
Eli Marmor wrote:
>
> Bill: as an insider, what do you suggest? to start with apr-util, and
> only then integrating the other parts in httpd and mod_perl, or to try
> to do all of these projects together?
Personal opinion? Only sane way to approach this is to take every element
that's a good, broad fit into apr-util and plug it in there (usual votes to
accept etc.)
Then take the slightly less generic, more httpd-ish and propose those into
httpd core.
That should solve the 80/20, then propose the perl glue into modperl and
voila - useful fn's for everyone, close integration, and specific modperl
connectivity where it belongs.
Bill
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic