[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       apr-dev
Subject:    Re: library versioning name
From:       Wilfredo_Sánchez <wsanchez () MIT ! EDU>
Date:       2002-09-20 17:49:49
[Download RAW message or body]

   OK, sure.  But you aren't using the -framework option, cheater.  :-)

	-wsv

On Friday, September 20, 2002, at 02:26  AM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:

> On Thursday, September 19, 2002, at 10:53 PM, Wilfredo Sanchez wrote:
>
>>   Pier, frameworks do provide the right information for all versions,  
>> but there is no compiler flag in OS X to build and link against an  
>> old version, which is moderately lame.  I do think it would be swell  
>> if the GNU folks could be convinced to add something like -framework  
>> to standard gcc, though it could probably use some improvement over  
>> the current model in Darwin.
>
> Ok, now I'm going against the master :-)
>
> Linking to JDK 1.3.1 (the default)...
>
> cc \
> 	-L/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Libraries \
> 	-I/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Headers \
> 	-ljvm .....
>
> Against 1.4
>
> cc \
> 	-L/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.4.0/ 
> Libraries \
> 	-I/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.4.0/Headers \
> 	-ljvm .....
>
> Ok, I can't specify -version , but it is trivial enough! :-)
>
> 	Pier

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]