[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: apr-dev
Subject: Re: cvs commit: apr/misc/win32 apr_app.c
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe () covalent ! net>
Date: 2002-01-29 19:56:37
[Download RAW message or body]
From: "Greg Stein" <gstein@lyra.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 1:43 PM
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 06:27:19AM -0000, wrowe@apache.org wrote:
> >...
> > extern int main(int argc, char **argv, char **env);
> >
> > static int wastrtoastr(char ***retarr, int args, wchar_t **arr)
> > {
> > size_t elesize = 0;
> > char **newarr;
> > char *elements;
>
> Should 'const' be used more throughout this code?
Well the new elements certainly aren't const until we have constructed them :)
> > char *ele;
> > int arg;
> >
> > if (args < 0) {
> > for (args = 0; arr[args]; ++args)
> > ;
> > }
> >
> > newarr = malloc(arg * sizeof(char *));
>
> Since this is Win32 specific code, is there a benefit to using Win32
> allocation routines?
As you will note in a later patch - we had to and I've done so (using the
clib code) because of internal consistency checks. =-/
Bill
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic