[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       apparmor-dev
Subject:    Re: [apparmor] LXC + AppArmor vs. upcoming systemd v240
From:       John Johansen <john.johansen () canonical ! com>
Date:       2018-10-28 0:36:18
Message-ID: 6322764f-e521-c7b9-b07c-7575b90f8557 () canonical ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 10/27/18 1:21 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> Stéphane Graber:
>> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 2:32 PM intrigeri <intrigeri@debian.org> wrote:
>>> Any chance the release branch that has this feature (presumably 3.x)
>>> becomes stable by the end of the year?
> 
>> That'd be a question for Christian I think as he'd be the one doing
>> maintenance on it.
> 
>> I think we were aiming towards February-ish originally but there's no
>> real reason to wait that long either, so if Christian isn't waiting
>> for some big changes to land before doing a non-LTS feature release,
>> we should be able to tag one next month.
> 
> Sounds great!
> 
>> It'd be worth someone make sure that current master with the apparmor
>> work that was done by Wolfgang will do the right thing out of the box
>> though, otherwise that wouldn't really achieve a whole lot.
> 
> Absolutely ⇒ I've reported a summary of this conversation to the
> Debian LXC maintainers, suggesting someone tests this.
> 

Having a new LXC release directly is the best solution but I have an
idea for an alternative solution that I will poke at as a potential
fallback plan.

-- 
AppArmor mailing list
AppArmor@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]