--nextPart1805012.Nm3FZB8HC5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 15 September 2004 1:14 am, Robert Clark wrote: > On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 19:09, Christian Parpart wrote: > > well, this is a rather odd problem I actually have. > > So, I must be able to get arguments containing a # as argument value, > > e.g. > > [ snip ] > > > So, finally I got it by URL encoding the '#' into a "%23", but my > > question now is, WHAT chars "are declared to be invalid" in URL > > arguments, and though, "has to be" encoded in the well known way? > > RFC 1738 defines how URLs are to be encoded. It has the following > paragraphs: [snip] Well, that's what I obviousely had to read. Thanks alot ;) Christian Parpart. =2D-=20 01:42:46 up 21 days, 13:22, 3 users, load average: 0.10, 0.25, 0.27 --nextPart1805012.Nm3FZB8HC5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBR4ItPpa2GmDVhK0RAvicAJ9CULztb2s3LRWPs7p7759jckZ/iACeP38P LGayLjV2ByaaaaiO4R6D9To= =ph2S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1805012.Nm3FZB8HC5--