[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: apache-modperl-dev
Subject: Re: [mp2] s/APR::Finfo/APR::FInfo/?
From: Stas Bekman <stas () stason ! org>
Date: 2003-12-17 23:28:23
[Download RAW message or body]
Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
> Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>>Before we released the new API in the wild, how about
>>s/APR::Finfo/APR::FInfo/ I find myself typing APR::FInfo instead of
>>APR::Finfo all the time, as this is the convention we follow for most
>>modules.
>
>
> I prefer it the way it is - it's the finfo field in the request rec, not the
> fInfo or FInfo field. while we have some examples where we double-cap
> classes in cases like these (APR::SockAddr), the majority of them have a _
> between the names (RequestRec) or are clearly disinguished (ServerUtil).
>
> but if you absolutely need to change it...
I have no strong feelings about it. If you think it's fine, then it's OK with
me. I'm just trying to think of more intuitive spelling.
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic