[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       apache-modperl
Subject:    RE: does mod_perl with USE_DSO=1 require perl built with -Duseshr
From:       "Paul G. Weiss" <PGWeiss () arity ! com>
Date:       2000-05-29 21:57:02
[Download RAW message or body]

I use it with USE_DSO=1 without having built Perl
with -Duseshrplib.  I have all the Apache modules
built as DSO's.

By the way, what is Apache 1.3.14?  The latest version
on the Apache site is 1.3.12.

-Paul


-----Original Message-----
From: Benedict Lofstedt [mailto:benedict@daimi.au.dk]
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 7:57 AM
To: modperl@apache.org
Subject: does mod_perl with USE_DSO=1 require perl built with
-Duseshrplib ?


I have a number of apache servers on various hosts, not all of them are to
be mod_perl enabled.  So, I tried to build apache with mod_perl as a DSO in
order to enable mod_perl via the httpd.conf file if needed.

I tried building mod_perl-1.24 as a DSO for apache-1.3.14 on my Irix
platform.  Building went well, I got a libperl.so etc.

However, the resulting httpd failed during make test, with a message about
not being able to find PL_curpad when loading IO.so - similar to what is
described in mod_perl_traps.pod.

The unsatisfied symbol is in libperl.a.

This looks like mod_perl as DSO *requires* perl to be built with
-Duseshrplib .  Is this correct?

I like the improvements in mod_perl Makefile.PL which checks consistency
between perl and apache regarding -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE.  If USE_DSO=1
requires a perl built with -Duseshrplib, perhaps mod_perl Makefile.PL could
be modified to check this as well?

--- benedict

-- 
Benedict Lofstedt     <blofstedt@daimi.au.dk>
University of Aarhus, Department of Computer Science	  Fax:   + 45 8942
3255
Building 540, Ny Munkegade, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.    Phone: + 45 8942
3222

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]