[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       apache-logging-general
Subject:    Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 1.2.14 based on RC2
From:       Ralph Goers <ralph.goers () dslextreme ! com>
Date:       2015-11-11 5:45:36
Message-ID: 44D3EC6D-9A0A-4A36-B9AC-D80B721C50DE () dslextreme ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Replying again to include Log4NET Dev

+1

I tried to build one of the sample apps but they seem to require .Net 1.0 and .Net \
4.0 only seems to go down to 2.0.  So I really can't verify that it runs. But all the \
packaging seems to be fine.

Ralph

> On Nov 10, 2015, at 4:50 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> On 2015-11-10, Ivan Habunek wrote:
> 
> > I can jump in if nobody else is available,
> 
> Thanks
> 
> > but I must warn you that I don't have a good idea how to test the
> > release. Do you have any guidelines?
> 
> About the same way I'd test a log4php release :-)
> 
> Seriously, if you haven't got a .NET project using the library you can't
> really test the library itself.  You can test the legal parts, though.
> Have we got license headers where needed, are things properly signed and
> all that.  On a Windows box you should see the DLLs contain metadata
> with the proper copyright information.
> 
> Stefan
> 


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]