[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: apache-logging-general
Subject: Re: [Discuss] Move log4cxx to "attic"
From: Christian Grobmeier <grobmeier () gmail ! com>
Date: 2012-06-12 12:02:26
Message-ID: CAPFNckgn4bdvw+wu00CkSrv7CSSya7eCTgzF84A1JnxLMtJbfg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org> wrote:
> On 2012-06-12, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Why would you want to hold it in a dormant state rather than move it
> directly to the Attic? If people show up who want to contribute,
> reviving it from the Attic shouldn't be more difficult than changing its
> state from dormant to active.
>
> I'd not be against marking it as dormant if you feel Attic was going too
> far.
Good point. I was not aware the Attic would eat subcomponents of
projects too rather than "complete projects". I am also fine with the
attic. And it does make sense instead inventing another graveyard.
>
> Stefan
--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic