[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       apache-httpd-dev
Subject:    Re: NO_USE_SIGACTION?
From:       Jim Jagielski <jim () devsys ! jaguNET ! com>
Date:       1999-11-30 13:58:05
[Download RAW message or body]

Manoj Kasichainula wrote:
> 
> Where NO_USE_SIGACTION is defined, is it because those platforms don't
> have sigaction(), or is it just unreliable? If the former, I can just
> introduce another autoconf check and be done with it. If the latter, I
> may just do it anyway, since I'm sure a big pile of problems go away
> now that 2.0 doesn't do as much signal stuff.
> 

The NO_USE_SIGACTION is to force that sigaction() not be used if it
exists. It's short for "we-have-sigaction-but-don't-use-it" :)

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
                "Are you suggesting coconuts migrate??"

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]