[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: apache-httpd-dev
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1898146 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: changes-entries/pr65881.txt modules/http2/h2_reque
From: Stefan Eissing <stefan () eissing ! org>
Date: 2022-02-17 17:50:28
Message-ID: 5940230F-3704-4D97-BB1A-E2B400ACE095 () eissing ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
> Am 17.02.2022 um 11:49 schrieb Ruediger Pluem <rpluem@apache.org>:
>
>
>
> On 2/17/22 11:06 AM, icing@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: icing
> > Date: Thu Feb 17 10:06:31 2022
> > New Revision: 1898146
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1898146&view=rev
> > Log:
> > *) mod_http2: preserve the port number given in a HTTP/1.1
> > request that was Upgraded to HTTP/2. Fixes PR65881.
> >
> >
> > Added:
> > httpd/httpd/trunk/changes-entries/pr65881.txt
> > httpd/httpd/trunk/test/modules/http2/test_502_proxy_port.py
> > Modified:
> > httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http2/h2_request.c
> > httpd/httpd/trunk/test/modules/http2/htdocs/cgi/hello.py
> >
>
> >
> > Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http2/h2_request.c
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http2/h2_request.c?rev=1898146&r1=1898145&r2=1898146&view=diff
> > ==============================================================================
> > --- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http2/h2_request.c (original)
> > +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http2/h2_request.c Thu Feb 17 10:06:31 2022
> > @@ -90,12 +90,25 @@ apr_status_t h2_request_rcreate(h2_reque
> > return APR_EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > - if (!ap_strchr_c(authority, ':') && r->server && r->server->port) {
> > - apr_port_t defport = apr_uri_port_of_scheme(scheme);
> > - if (defport != r->server->port) {
> > - /* port info missing and port is not default for scheme: append */
> > - authority = apr_psprintf(pool, "%s:%d", authority,
> > - (int)r->server->port);
> > + /* The authority we carry in h2_request is the 'authority' part of
> > + * the URL for the request. r->hostname has stripped any port info that
> > + * might have been present. Do we need to add it?
> > + */
> > + if (!ap_strchr_c(authority, ':')) {
> > + if (r->parsed_uri.port_str) {
> > + /* Yes, it was there, add it again. */
> > + authority = apr_psprintf(pool, "%s:%s", authority, \
> > r->parsed_uri.port_str);
>
> Performance nitpick. Wouldn't it be faster to do
>
> authority = apr_pstrcat(pool, authority, ":", r->parsed_uri.port_str, NULL);
>
Good point. I'll bring that in. Thanks.
> > + }
> > + else if (!r->parsed_uri.hostname && r->server && r->server->port) {
> > + /* If there was no hostname in the parsed URL, the URL was relative.
> > + * In that case, we restore port from our server->port, if it
> > + * is known and not the default port for the scheme. */
> > + apr_port_t defport = apr_uri_port_of_scheme(scheme);
> > + if (defport != r->server->port) {
> > + /* port info missing and port is not default for scheme: append \
> > */ + authority = apr_psprintf(pool, "%s:%d", authority,
> > + (int)r->server->port);
> > + }
> > }
> > }
> >
> >
>
> Regards
>
> RĂ¼diger
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic