[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       apache-httpd-dev
Subject:    ap_expr parser
From:       Stefan Fritsch <sf () sfritsch ! de>
Date:       2010-09-29 10:40:59
Message-ID: 201009291240.59718.sf () sfritsch ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wednesday 29 September 2010, Nick Kew wrote:
> Good stuff, and motivated me to get around to r1002415 :)

Nice :)

> But shouldn't adding const-ness to an API argument call for an MMN
> bump? I guess it doesn't matter to a caller, but might it affect a
> compiler?

I wasn't aware that this could make a difference to the compiler.

But looking at it again, I think it would make sense to change the 
"int *was_error" parameters into "const char **errstring" and return a 
useful error string there (or NULL if there was no error).
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]