[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       apache-httpd-dev
Subject:    Re: PR#41798 - mod_proxy URL mangling
From:       Jim Jagielski <jim () jaguNET ! com>
Date:       2007-10-25 14:58:19
Message-ID: 76F18FB6-ACEE-47CB-BE3E-E6C88D86AF26 () jaguNET ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


On Oct 25, 2007, at 10:33 AM, Nick Kew wrote:

> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:00:40 +0200
> Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group <ruediger.pluem@vodafone.com> wrote:
>
>>> However, on further reflection, I think it would be better to
>>> fall back to old behaviour in this case.  The difficulty is that
>>> this redirection catches cases where something is unnecessarily
>>> but perfectly legally URLencoded.  So a perverse client might
>>> re-encode the redirection, leaving us an infinite loop.
>>
>> What does "old behaviour" mean? Using r->uri in this case?
>
> Exactly.
>
> Any objections?
>

Conceptionally, no objections here.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]