[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       apache-httpd-dev
Subject:    Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES
From:       Jeff Trawick <trawick () attglobal ! net>
Date:       2003-02-28 19:07:21
[Download RAW message or body]

Greg Ames wrote:

> Aaron Bannert wrote:
>
> > I see the need for letting patches age in the unstable tree, but
> > I think we could do that without having to vote on each and
> > every change.
>
>
> Yeah, that's what I meant by "lazy consensus" in the STATUS file.


I would think lazy consensus would be when somebody actually states that 
they want to merge something and nobody stands up and says "no" within a 
certain timeframe.

Somehow the word "consensus" doesn't seem appropriate when there is no 
shared knowledge about what might get merged but instead it just gets 
suddenly merged.

> But I can also see problems with that being the policy.  What's mainline
> code vs. non-mainline?


not impossible to describe, if you aren't too picky

if it gets exercised by GET /cgi-bin/printenv or by GET /manual/ using 
the default config it is mainline?  just a guess

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]