[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: apache-docs
Subject: [Bug 60024] RewriteRule documentation: misleading sentence about "per-directory prefix"
From: bugzilla () apache ! org
Date: 2016-08-21 0:19:09
Message-ID: bug-60024-56585-q0De5bsyXV () https ! bz ! apache ! org/bugzilla/
[Download RAW message or body]
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60024
Filipus Klutiero <chealer@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEEDINFO |RESOLVED
--- Comment #6 from Filipus Klutiero <chealer@gmail.com> ---
Many thanks Eric, this solves this issue. I still have some remarks:
"In this context" follows a paragraph which says "In Directory and htaccess
context". This could be solved by replacing "In Directory and htaccess context"
with "In per-directory context".
The Syntax defines "directory-path" (with a dash) rather than "directory path".
The phrasing sometimes assumes per-directory rules are defined in an htaccess
file, for example in "The directory path where the rule is defined is stripped
before comparison (up to and including a trailing slash)."
"The directory path where the rule is defined" could be substituted with "The
directory-path of the directory to which the rule is associated".
This uses 3 terms ("currently mapped filesystem", "currently mapped path" and
"currently mapped filesystem path") to designate what appears to be the same
thing. I think the first should be substituted with the last ("currently mapped
filesystem path").
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic