[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       apache-docs
Subject:    Re: [Bug 59316] New: Broken links in HTML manual
From:       Luca Toscano <toscano.luca () gmail ! com>
Date:       2016-04-16 10:10:51
Message-ID: CAFedD42+EV9TDZ9o7+4sN6sOKsOc7+cnFVaBs3FiJqBeRLyDFw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

2016-04-14 14:58 GMT+02:00 Rich Bowen <rbowen@rcbowen.com>:

>
>
> On 04/13/2016 09:07 AM, bugzilla@apache.org wrote:
>
>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
>>
>>              Bug ID: 59316
>>             Summary: Broken links in HTML manual
>>             Product: Apache httpd-2
>>             Version: 2.5-HEAD
>>            Hardware: PC
>>                  OS: Linux
>>              Status: NEW
>>            Severity: normal
>>            Priority: P2
>>           Component: Documentation
>>            Assignee: docs@httpd.apache.org
>>            Reporter: mfrodl@redhat.com
>>
>> There are dozens of broken links—both internal and external—in the HTML
>> manual
>> shipped with the latest released version httpd (2.4.20). See attachment
>> for the
>> full list of such links and where they are located.
>>
>>
> Can someone more familiar with the recent HTTP/2 work have a look at
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/misc/relevant_standards.html and
> update the relevant HTTP standards that we are implementing? There's some
> broken links in that doc, but I'm not certain where we *should* be linking.
>
> Furthermore, using purl.org for URLs in that document isn't really
> something that we want to do, so when you update the link to the HTTP/1.1
> spec, please use an actual URL for that. Thanks.


AFAIK the HTTP/2 RFCs should be the ones indicated in
https://http2.github.io/, but I'll try to double check next week (and try
to fix the purl.org URLs too).

Luca

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-04-14 \
14:58 GMT+02:00 Rich Bowen <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:rbowen@rcbowen.com" \
target="_blank">rbowen@rcbowen.com</a>&gt;</span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" \
style="margin:0px 0px 0px \
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><span \
class=""><br> <br>
On 04/13/2016 09:07 AM, <a href="mailto:bugzilla@apache.org" \
target="_blank">bugzilla@apache.org</a> wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" \
style="margin:0px 0px 0px \
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
 <a href="https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316" rel="noreferrer" \
target="_blank">https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316</a><br> <br>
                    Bug ID: 59316<br>
                  Summary: Broken links in HTML manual<br>
                  Product: Apache httpd-2<br>
                  Version: 2.5-HEAD<br>
                 Hardware: PC<br>
                          OS: Linux<br>
                    Status: NEW<br>
                 Severity: normal<br>
                 Priority: P2<br>
               Component: Documentation<br>
                 Assignee: <a href="mailto:docs@httpd.apache.org" \
                target="_blank">docs@httpd.apache.org</a><br>
                 Reporter: <a href="mailto:mfrodl@redhat.com" \
target="_blank">mfrodl@redhat.com</a><br> <br>
There are dozens of broken links—both internal and external—in the HTML \
manual<br> shipped with the latest released version httpd (2.4.20). See attachment \
for the<br> full list of such links and where they are located.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
Can someone more familiar with the recent HTTP/2 work have a look at <a \
href="http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/misc/relevant_standards.html" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/misc/relevant_standards.html</a> \
and update the relevant HTTP standards that we are implementing? There&#39;s some \
broken links in that doc, but I&#39;m not certain where we *should* be linking.<br> \
<br> Furthermore, using <a href="http://purl.org" rel="noreferrer" \
target="_blank">purl.org</a> for URLs in that document isn&#39;t really something \
that we want to do, so when you update the link to the HTTP/1.1 spec, please use an \
actual URL for that. Thanks.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>AFAIK the HTTP/2 RFCs \
should be the ones indicated in <a \
href="https://http2.github.io/">https://http2.github.io/</a>, but I&#39;ll try to \
double check next week (and try to fix the <a href="http://purl.org">purl.org</a> \
URLs too).</div><div><br></div><div>Luca  </div></div></div></div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]