[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: apache-docs
Subject: Re: compatibility tags in 2.4.x tree
From: Daniel Ruggeri <DRuggeri () primary ! net>
Date: 2013-12-05 23:45:26
Message-ID: 52A11016.4040202 () primary ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
On 12/4/2013 3:06 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> If a module in the 2.4.x doc has inherited a compatibility tag of
> "first available in 2.3.x", should we
>
> [ ] leave it
> [ ] wipe it entirely
> [ ] change it to 2.4.0 to give an indication it's new in this release?
>
> I am split between 2 and 3.
Leaving it as-is should be fine. Although few, those versions do exist
and it's more useful to know exactly when something was added than to
guess. I think everyone is capable of recognizing that 2.3.x < 2.4.x
... unless the goal is to deny the existence of the odd-number versions.
In that case, I'd say 3.
--
Daniel Ruggeri
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic