[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       apache-docs
Subject:    Re: svn commit: r558718 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod: mod_cgi.html.en mod_cgi.xml
From:       André_Malo <nd () perlig ! de>
Date:       2007-07-24 12:19:27
Message-ID: 200707241419.27871.nd () perlig ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

* Vincent Bray wrote: 


> On 23/07/07, André Malo <nd@perlig.de> wrote:
> > * Vincent Bray wrote:
> > > It doesn't make the merge any easier (that often works fine with two
> > > separate WCs like "svn merge -r99:100 ../httpd-trunk .") but it would
> > > allow for a single commit rather than two or three (hence making it
> > > more likely that 2.0 would get fixes).
> >
> > FWIW, I personally like it to see 3 commits, for easier oversight
> > and "think-before-you-type" reasons.
> > However, I do prefer separate xml and html commits, too :-)
>
> Does that avoid the issue of trailing meta data? At the moment I'll
> fiddle the xml, build the html version, commit both. Then the next
> cycle gets a bunch of build detritus because of the new revision
> number from the previous commit.

You would have a separation between edited and generated data. So looked at 
it that way - yes.

nd

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]