[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       apache-bugdb
Subject:    Re: general/8138: Apache 2.0 don't bind to the port correctly
From:       rbb () apache ! org
Date:       2001-08-30 20:56:20
[Download RAW message or body]

[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, you need]
[to include <apbugs@Apache.Org> in the Cc line and make sure the]
[subject line starts with the report component and number, with ]
[or without any 'Re:' prefixes (such as "general/1098:" or      ]
["Re: general/1098:").  If the subject doesn't match this       ]
[pattern, your message will be misfiled and ignored.  The       ]
["apbugs" address is not added to the Cc line of messages from  ]
[the database automatically because of the potential for mail   ]
[loops.  If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig-   ]
[nored unless you are responding to an explicit request from a  ]
[developer.  Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS!     ]


Synopsis: Apache 2.0 don't bind to the port correctly

State-Changed-From-To: closed-open
State-Changed-By: rbb
State-Changed-When: Thu Aug 30 13:56:19 PDT 2001
State-Changed-Why:
Re-opening for a couple of reasons.

1)  It isn't fixed yet.
2)  I believe this is a problem with IPv6 vs IPv4 config,
    and even if the directive names change, the behavior
    isn't going to.

I am looking into exactly what is happening and why now.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]