[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       apache-bugdb
Subject:    os-windows/2317: Current Working Directory of CGI executable is C:\WINNT\system32
From:       George Elkins <gfe () chesapeake ! com>
Date:       1998-05-29 15:37:23
[Download RAW message or body]


>Number:         2317
>Category:       os-windows
>Synopsis:       Current Working Directory of CGI executable is C:\WINNT\system32
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    apache
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   apache
>Arrival-Date:   Fri May 29 08:40:00 PDT 1998
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     gfe@chesapeake.com
>Organization:
apache
>Release:        1.3b7
>Environment:
NT Workstation 4 Service Pack 3

>Description:
Cannot run a CGI executable in 1.3b7, which works in 1.3b6, due to the
CGI executable starting up with Current Working Directory
being C:\WINNT\system32.  In 1.3b6 the Current Working Directory was the
cgi-bin directory where the CGI executable is located.

The CGI executable does an fopen() with relative path to open a
needed configuration file, which is no longer found due to CWD
being different.

if (! (cfile = fopen("mimiweb.cnf", "r"))) {
   char currentpath[128], errormsg[512];
   getcwd(currentpath, 128);
   sprintf
    (errormsg, "Could not open configuration file: getcwd()=\"%s\"", currentpath);
   errorh(cgiOut, errormsg);
   return 0;
}
>How-To-Repeat:
Compile a simple CGI executable which just prints out the CWD and
exits, and note the difference in results between 1.3b6 and 1.3b7.

I haven't tried this in Perl (since I don't have that in NT),
but maybe this is the simplest way to repeat the problem.
>Fix:
Use a Win32 thread-safe way of setting current working directory
to where the CGI executable is loaded.
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <apbugs@Apache.Org> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED.  This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]