[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: apache-bugdb
Subject: general/9085: Feature query for A2.0: Do children still "linger" on TIME_WAIT?
From: Jerrad Pierce <belg4mit () mit ! edu>
Date: 2001-11-28 5:54:07
[Download RAW message or body]
>Number: 9085
>Category: general
>Synopsis: Feature query for A2.0: Do children still "linger" on TIME_WAIT?
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: apache
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: apache
>Arrival-Date: Wed Dec 12 12:40:08 PST 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: belg4mit@mit.edu
>Release: Apache 2.0
>Organization:
apache
>Environment:
n/a
>Description:
Is somehting like this:
http://www.iagora.com/about/software/lingerd/
Still going to be useful or will Apache 2.0
have a builtin mechanism for this?
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
Have the parent process do the waiting and
not the children?
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, you need]
[to include <apbugs@Apache.Org> in the Cc line and make sure the]
[subject line starts with the report component and number, with ]
[or without any 'Re:' prefixes (such as "general/1098:" or ]
["Re: general/1098:"). If the subject doesn't match this ]
[pattern, your message will be misfiled and ignored. The ]
["apbugs" address is not added to the Cc line of messages from ]
[the database automatically because of the potential for mail ]
[loops. If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ]
[nored unless you are responding to an explicit request from a ]
[developer. Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ]
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic