[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       amarok-devel
Subject:    Re: Qt dependency opinion
From:       Edward Toroshchin <edward.hades () gmail ! com>
Date:       2013-04-03 12:30:11
Message-ID: 20130403122426.GB2976 () phobos
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:13:56PM +0200, Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
> The discussion is open now, if no obvious reason is given why we
> should not depend on Qt 4.8.2 in the next few days we will keep that
> dependency switch, else we will revert it.

There is no point discussing this now. At this point reverting would be
rather harmful than beneficial.

Let's just close the issue, learn from the mistakes and carry on.

-- 
Edward "Hades" Toroshchin
dr_lepper on irc.freenode.org
_______________________________________________
Amarok-devel mailing list
Amarok-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic