[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       amarok-devel
Subject:    Re: Bug report / Playlist behaviour change request
From:       Thomas =?iso-8859-15?q?L=FCbking?= <thomas.luebking () web ! de>
Date:       2010-05-04 11:59:16
Message-ID: 201005041359.16327.thomas.luebking () web ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Monday 03 May 2010 schrieb Maik Keller:
> Hi, isn't it more confusing if a queued track doesn't play? I thought that
> the filter is just a possibility to search the playlist which doesn't
> modify the playing behavior.
The current behaviour is at least consistent ("you get what you see").
I'd rather say you want a general "not-filtering-online-search" (your second 
sentence) -> filter != search - whether to replace or in addition.
 
> IMO it makes more sense fixing it than leaving it as it is.
Altering the filter behaviour depending on the (not obviously related) queue 
state sounds rather confusing and unexpected to me :-\

Thomas

> 1. Mai 2010 9:11 nachm. schrieb am "Téo Mrnjavac" <teo@kde.org>:
> > On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 17:43, Nanno Langstraat <langstr@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> OK, I see this old pl...
> 
>> I'm not convinced that it needs to be changed, if I had just filtered
>> something out it would confuse me if it started playing anyway.
_______________________________________________
Amarok-devel mailing list
Amarok-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic