[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       amarok-devel
Subject:    Re: Queuing - final call
From:       "Bart Cerneels" <bart.cerneels () kde ! org>
Date:       2008-12-19 19:16:15
Message-ID: dd7ac1430812191116t60a56a8bk671c3815e407dbce () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Seb Ruiz <ruiz@kde.org> wrote:
> Squad,
> I'd like to get a final decision on what we do about queuing. Options are:
>
> A) My implementation, which is a direct clone of 1.4 functionality
> (although a little simpler atm)
> or;
> B) Bart's implementation which is quite a bit different, yet very
> interesting. Please read his mail.
>
> Just a simple +1 A/B will do, no need to start discussing the topic
> again. Please refrain from putting in your personal use cases here, or
> letting them make up your mind. Decide based on what you think will be
> the most useful as a whole to the application and the community.

I should mention that A will probably not exclude B, these 2 things
can exist in parallel.

However, I would suggest to not start pilling up features unto the
Playlist that are very queue oriented or the other way around (being
meant to edit a Meta::Playlist). I'll post a follow up on the other
thread with a few insights I got after a chat with Nikolaj earlier
today.It might be something you could consider for your implementation
Seb.
_______________________________________________
Amarok-devel mailing list
Amarok-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]