[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       amarok-devel
Subject:    Re: Database
From:       "T.R.Shashwath" <trshash84 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2007-02-25 8:54:13
Message-ID: 200702251412.14067.trshash84 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sunday 25 February 2007 00:41, Alexandre Oliveira wrote:
> I see your point about the urls, though. Maybe they should be actually
> be on the uniqueid table, and be a FK on the tags table? It would mean
> we'd always  need uniqueids for any url in the collection before we
> add it to the tags table. Sounds sensible to me, can it be a problem
> in any way?

Just thought of another advantage of putting urls in the uniqueid table: Files 
that are not taggable for whatever reasons (on CD, in wave format, whatever) 
can be identified by uniqueid and we can just look up their tags in the 
table.

Shash
-- 
'Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?'
 'That depends a good deal on where you want to get to,'
 'I don't know where. . .'
 'Then it doesn't matter which way you go,'
--Lewis Carroll, Alice in wonderland
_______________________________________________
Amarok-devel mailing list
Amarok-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]