[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       amarok-bugs-dist
Subject:    [Bug 265567] Amarok 2.4.0, compiled on Jan 29, 2011, destroys the database
From:       Matěj Laitl <matej () laitl ! cz>
Date:       2012-12-28 18:34:59
Message-ID: bug-265567-71684-eJOYvnBOnu () http ! bugs ! kde ! org/
[Download RAW message or body]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=265567

--- Comment #51 from Matěj Laitl <matej@laitl.cz> ---
(In reply to comment #50)
> The version of udisks is the same on gentoo and ubuntu but the version of
> solid is newer in gentoo (4.9.3) than in ubuntu (4.8.5).

François,
again, sharing a single Amarok database for multiple hosts is not officially
supported.

It could work if you disable dynamic collection on all hosts. [1]

[1] http://community.kde.org/Amarok/Development/Dynamic_Collection

> What I still don't
> understand is that in gentoo, the same version of amarok set the device
> field in the urls table to -1 while is set to a positive value in ubuntu
> which is also present in the devices table. This is why amarok in ubuntu
> thinks al tracks have disappeared and are thus removed from the database.

This could be because dynamic collection is disabled on Gentoo and enabled on
Ubuntu. Amarok assigns -1 as device id to all tracks urls when dynamic
collection is turned off. And Again, changing device ids in devices table don't
lead to data-loss bugs with Amarok 2.6 or 2.7 Beta, just hit Update Collection.
(the track counter in Local Collection tab maybe off, but this is a display
bug)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Amarok-bugs-dist mailing list
Amarok-bugs-dist@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-bugs-dist

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]