[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       amarok
Subject:    Re: Q: dynamic playlist of unrated songs
From:       Orville Bennett <illogical1 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2009-07-06 22:12:09
Message-ID: 4A5276B9.70102 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Gary Steinert wrote:
> On Thursday 02 July 2009 01:56:13 Jeff Mitchell wrote:
>> Yes.  The statement that "rating it 1/2 suggests I like something about
>> it" is totally stupid, because if 1/2 is the lowest rating you can give
>> the track, it's pretty clear that you don't like anything about the
>> track, because you can't rate it any lower.  This isn't a valid reason
>> why the lowest rating possible must be zero.
>
> I was talking from a users point of view, in that setting the lowest possible
> rating to 1/2 would be about as intuitive as saying "You can rate a track
> between 10 and 20". To most people, any scale of rating starts at 0, not 1/2
> or 10 or any other number.
9 out 10 people disagree.
_______________________________________________
Amarok mailing list
Amarok@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]