[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       amarok
Subject:    Re: Proposal: generalize playlist concept
From:       "Pavel Shved" <pavel.shved () gmail ! com>
Date:       2009-01-13 0:34:06
Message-ID: 2ce6d12f0901121634n786b7f91lc84a78a56af1e52a () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

2009/1/13 Seb Ruiz <ruiz@kde.org>:
>> User can hide it at all or use in a limited way without need to
>> touch complex stuff.
>
> This is exactly the sort of thing that we're trying to avoid in Amarok
> 2. We want to provide maximum features with minimum obscurity, which
> is something that we struggled with in Amarok 1.4.

Obscurity?  Hm.  I would understand your point if i was proposing
playlist programming language.  But i'm not.

I really can't imagine what can be less obscure than a window that
tells the user nearly in English, "Hey, I'm playing Track 1, then
going to play Track 67 and also 98 more random tracks from your
playlist!"

Is there something i still don't understand?  Or our discussion is at
the dead end alreasy?

Thanks,
Pavel.
_______________________________________________
Amarok mailing list
Amarok@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]