[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       amarok
Subject:    Re: Proposal: generalize playlist concept - short version with pics
From:       Pavel Shved <pavel.shved () gmail ! com>
Date:       2009-01-12 11:08:06
Message-ID: 496B2496.8030202 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Seb Ruiz wrote:
> We intentionally removed this from Amarok 2 (we used to have a queue manager).
...
> Tabbed playlists are not a feature that we are willing to support,
Without these two things my proposal loses all its attractivity and 
sense.  I do admit it.

With at least one of them, it introduces logical (for developers) and 
user-controllable (with several difficulty levels for different users) 
way to implement these concepts and for them to interact.  Not only for 
developers, for users!

 From user's perspective he may even not see the queue at all - if he 
feels he's not advanced enough.  Non-advanced user just keeps pressing 
same buttons, and invisible queue will change itsself according to 
patters.  But if the user feels advanced enough, why restrict him?


Pavel.
_______________________________________________
Amarok mailing list
Amarok@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]