[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       amarok
Subject:    Re: Absolutely awesome plasmoid idea: the playlist itself
From:       "Seb Ruiz" <ruiz () kde ! org>
Date:       2009-01-08 0:41:09
Message-ID: 60ebdd0b0901071641i3cd4c529w902dc8e90c9befbb () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

2009/1/8 Robert Smits <bob@rsmits.ca>:
> You see, Henry, I think plasmoids suck. I'd rather not have any feature of
> Amarok, which I really really like depend on bling from KDE4 to work.

What difference does it make to you, as a user, what container or how
the functionality is exposed to you? Does the term "plasmoid" unnerve
you and make you feel that it may be unstable?

> I don't care about which libraries I need installed, I just don't want the
> only option for my playlist to be in a plasmoid. It would be fine with me if
> you make it an option I can refuse, but I'd like to be able to use Amarok2 in
> KDE3.

Once again, what difference does it make? You can use Amarok 2 within
KDE3 regardless of whether we use plasmoids in our application or not
(which we are).



-- 
Seb Ruiz

http://www.sebruiz.net/
http://amarok.kde.org/
_______________________________________________
Amarok mailing list
Amarok@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]