[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       amarok
Subject:    Re: Proposal: Rating tag logic
From:       "Seb Ruiz" <ruiz () kde ! org>
Date:       2009-01-06 23:05:14
Message-ID: 60ebdd0b0901061505n6c729f37s1d5838ba7b00dcb7 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

2009/1/7 Jud Craft <craftjml@gmail.com>:
> Whatcha think?

Jud,
I appreciate the effort you took in presenting your improvement, but
in the future please be more succinct. From experience I can tell you
that we are much less likely to read and consider a proposal the
length of a short story.

There are infact many more cons that you may realise, including:
 - Multiple user conflicts
 - Unintuitive rating changes (ratings are static, manually set values)
 - You're confusing score and rating (internal to amarok), and rating
(tag attribute). If you're confusing them, so will everyone else.

I only just skimmed your email so I may have missed out on a few
things. I'll give it a more detailed look later.

-- 
Seb Ruiz

http://www.sebruiz.net/
http://amarok.kde.org/
_______________________________________________
Amarok mailing list
Amarok@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]