[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: amarok
Subject: Re: [Feedback] Database rescan
From: Greg Meyer <greg () gkmweb ! com>
Date: 2007-10-01 2:52:10
Message-ID: 200709302252.10419.greg () gkmweb ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On Sunday 30 September 2007, rostowski@gmail.com wrote:
> Wojciech Rostowski sent a message using the contact form at
> http://amarok.kde.org/en/contact.
>
> Hi, I have a question. Why every rescan of my database consumes so much
> time (aprox. 10 minutes) ?. I've got around 5000 songs, and a rescan on
> foobar2000 takes up to 1 minute. Will Amarok 2.0 bring some new
> improvements ? Cheers, Wojciech
I would imagine the rescan in foobar2000 is what we would call an update in
amarok, and it is very fast because it only scans the files that changed. A
rescan re-reads the tags of every file in the collection so it takes awhile.
The next time you make changes. try using the update command instead of
rescan.
--
Greg
_______________________________________________
Amarok mailing list
Amarok@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic