[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       amanda-users
Subject:    Re: Another dumper question
From:       Chris Nighswonger <cnighswonger () foundations ! edu>
Date:       2018-11-28 13:19:56
Message-ID: CAP3yOokgCXiHh1O4ag+hLem-jHsLLWbphGgQg=e6FzsXkpfFCg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:28 PM Chris Nighswonger <
cnighswonger@foundations.edu> wrote:

>
>
> So I've set these params back as they were before (ie. inparallel 10,
> maxdumps 1) and opened the throttle on the bandwidth. We'll see if
> things get better or worse tonight. I have a few more DLEs I need to
> split which may help the over all problem.
>

The results are in:

 dumper0 busy   :  5:25:03  ( 98.03%)
 dumper1 busy   :  4:26:25  ( 80.35%)
 dumper2 busy   :  4:05:57  ( 74.18%)
 dumper3 busy   :  1:55:55  ( 34.96%)
 dumper4 busy   :  3:21:39  ( 60.82%)
 dumper5 busy   :  2:12:41  ( 40.02%)
 dumper6 busy   :  1:55:50  ( 34.93%)
 dumper7 busy   :  2:18:20  ( 41.72%)
 dumper8 busy   :  1:57:28  ( 35.43%)
 dumper9 busy   :  2:10:02  ( 39.22%)
 0 dumpers busy :  0:06:32  (  1.97%)                   0:  0:06:32
(100.00%)
 1 dumper busy  :  0:58:37  ( 17.68%)                   0:  0:58:37
(100.00%)
 2 dumpers busy :  0:20:26  (  6.17%)                   0:  0:20:26
(100.00%)
 3 dumpers busy :  0:43:21  ( 13.08%)                   0:  0:43:21
(100.00%)
 4 dumpers busy :  1:04:15  ( 19.38%)                   0:  1:04:15
(100.00%)
 5 dumpers busy :  0:05:38  (  1.70%)                   0:  0:05:38
(100.00%)
 6 dumpers busy :  0:02:38  (  0.79%)                   0:  0:02:38  (
99.99%)
 7 dumpers busy :  0:12:34  (  3.79%)                   0:  0:12:34
(100.00%)
 8 dumpers busy :  0:01:38  (  0.49%)                   0:  0:01:38  (
99.99%)
 9 dumpers busy :  0:00:52  (  0.27%)                   0:  0:00:52  (
99.65%)
10 dumpers busy :  1:54:57  ( 34.67%)                   0:  1:53:34  (
98.79%)

Here's a graph of the bandwidth on the trunking interface on the switch the
backup server is on:

[image: 192.168.x.x_1_1-day.png]

As you can see, the network load is negligible even during business hours.
So the giving amanda the reigns is not a problem and it looks like the
dumps are running more efficiently.

Comments appreciated.

Kind regards,
Chris

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Mon, Nov 26, \
2018 at 3:28 PM Chris Nighswonger &lt;<a \
href="mailto:cnighswonger@foundations.edu">cnighswonger@foundations.edu</a>&gt; \
wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px \
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><br> <br>
So I&#39;ve set these params back as they were before (ie. inparallel 10,<br>
maxdumps 1) and opened the throttle on the bandwidth. We&#39;ll see if<br>
things get better or worse tonight. I have a few more DLEs I need to<br>
split which may help the over all problem.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The \
results are in:</div><div><br></div><div> dumper0 busy   :  5:25:03  ( 98.03%)<br> \
dumper1 busy   :  4:26:25  ( 80.35%)<br> dumper2 busy   :  4:05:57  ( 74.18%)<br> \
dumper3 busy   :  1:55:55  ( 34.96%)<br> dumper4 busy   :  3:21:39  ( 60.82%)<br> \
dumper5 busy   :  2:12:41  ( 40.02%)<br> dumper6 busy   :  1:55:50  ( 34.93%)<br> \
dumper7 busy   :  2:18:20  ( 41.72%)<br> dumper8 busy   :  1:57:28  ( 35.43%)<br> \
dumper9 busy   :  2:10:02  ( 39.22%)<br> 0 dumpers busy :  0:06:32  (  1.97%)         \
0:  0:06:32  (100.00%)<br> 1 dumper busy  :  0:58:37  ( 17.68%)                   0:  \
0:58:37  (100.00%)<br> 2 dumpers busy :  0:20:26  (  6.17%)                   0:  \
0:20:26  (100.00%)<br> 3 dumpers busy :  0:43:21  ( 13.08%)                   0:  \
0:43:21  (100.00%)<br> 4 dumpers busy :  1:04:15  ( 19.38%)                   0:  \
1:04:15  (100.00%)<br> 5 dumpers busy :  0:05:38  (  1.70%)                   0:  \
0:05:38  (100.00%)<br> 6 dumpers busy :  0:02:38  (  0.79%)                   0:  \
0:02:38  ( 99.99%)<br> 7 dumpers busy :  0:12:34  (  3.79%)                   0:  \
0:12:34  (100.00%)<br> 8 dumpers busy :  0:01:38  (  0.49%)                   0:  \
0:01:38  ( 99.99%)<br> 9 dumpers busy :  0:00:52  (  0.27%)                   0:  \
0:00:52  ( 99.65%)<br>10 dumpers busy :  1:54:57  ( 34.67%)                   0:  \
1:53:34  ( 98.79%)<br></div><div><br></div><div>Here&#39;s a graph of the bandwidth \
on the trunking interface on the switch the backup server is \
on:</div><div><br></div><div><div><img src="cid:ii_jp16yyim0" \
alt="192.168.x.x_1_1-day.png" width="480" height="130"></div><div><br></div><div>As \
you can see, the network load is negligible even during business hours. So the giving \
amanda the reigns is not a problem and it looks like the dumps are running more \
efficiently.</div><div><br></div><div>Comments \
appreciated.</div><div><br></div><div>Kind \
regards,</div><div>Chris<br></div></div></div></div></div> �M4�M4�M4{���}9����[


["192.168.x.x_1_1-day.png" (image/png)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]