[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       amanda-users
Subject:    Re: 2.6.1p2 amcheck doesn't like "define holdingdisk" in
From:       Gene Heskett <gene.heskett () verizon ! net>
Date:       2010-03-30 2:46:17
Message-ID: 201003292246.17438.gene.heskett () verizon ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Monday 29 March 2010, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Craig Constantine <craig@blkbx.com> wrote:
>> ...line 2 is the "define holdingdisk . . ." line. Isn't this how I
>> define a holdingdisk?
>
>Until 3.1, you had to just use
>
> holdingdisk foo {
>  ...
> }
>
>In 3.1, you can define as many holding disks as you want, and then use
> them define holdingdisk "foo" {
>   ...
> }
> define holdingdisk "bar" {
>   ...
> }
>
> holdingdisk "foo"
>
>Where the form without the "define" is considered a combination: define
> and use.
>
>Dustin
>
I think I see.  Adding versatility while maintaining the old, I like that.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)

<change_m2> Will LINUX ever overtake sliced bread as the #1 achievement
            of mankind?
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]