'[AfrICANN-discuss] Domain name seizures: The end of the dotcom dominance?'

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List: africann
Subject: [AfrICANN-discuss] Domain name seizures: The end of the dotcom dominance?
From: Anne-Rachel_Inné <annerachel () gmail ! com>
Date: 2012-02-24 10:44:36
Message-ID: CAKNw-rDM0qGFGQ_KNKXBx+QMXRXvzDZ3cOb35sLUyCAffS9tsg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]

Domain name seizures: The end of the dotcom dominance?
*
http://www.technollama.co.uk/domain-name-seizures-the-end-of-the-dotcom-dominance
By Andres <http://www.technollama.co.uk/author/admin> On February 22,
2012· Leave
a Comment<http://www.technollama.co.uk/domain-name-seizures-the-end-of-the-dotcom-dominance#comments>

*

<http://www.technollama.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Dot-Com-bubble.jpg>

Back in November 2011 the US Department of Justice announced its
continuing<http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2011/November/11-ag-1540.html>program
of domain name seizures under the authority of the Immigration and
Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency. At the same time, ICE removed the domain
from 150 sites allegedly infringing copyright. Back then, I felt that this
would be a big development in the ongoing War on Piracy. Then we were hit
with the Megaupload arrests, an important part of which was the seizure of
its .com domain by US authorities using existing powers.

Last week we saw another incredible example of domain name seizure when
JotForm, a free web-based WYSIWYG form builder, had its .com domain
redirected<http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2012/02/secret-service-asks-for-shu \
tdown-of-legit-website-over-user-content-godaddy-complies.ars?clicked=related_right>by
 GoDaddy under request of the US Secret Service. It is believed that
this
was done because some people were using the service for phishing, but that
is besides the point. What is really interesting is that the domain
take-down has become the latest weapon in the US regulator arsenal, and it
seems like registrars are more than willing to comply with any order, even
if it is not judicial.

This has lots of worrying implications, but I believe that there must be
growing concern amongst legitimate businesses around the world about the
viability of keeping a .com domain name, specially if the business has any
sort of involvement with users and user-generated content. It is clear that
sites which engage in copyright infringing are starting to migrate outside
of the US, with The Pirate Bay being the most prominent example when it
moved to a .se domain.  But should legitimate operators do the same? The
answer to me is yes. With the presence of trigger-happy law enforcement
agencies running amok in the US with the domain name system, I cannot see
how an international business would endanger its name by keeping a .com
name. Sure, they were useful once, but in the age of Google their
importance is overstated, and it doesn’t really matter anymore if your
domain is .co, .ly or .ca. It seems clear that keeping a domain with a
US-based registrar may open one to have any domain seized with little or no
prior notification, and with no apparent legal recourse.

Similarly, a big concern for any business should be that by keeping a
domain name in a US registrar could also be the equivalent of signing up to
American jurisdiction. Needless to say, if your country has an unfairly
harsh extradition<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2087135/Richard-ODwyer-US-extradition-pact-misused-says-Sir-Menzies-Campbell.html>agreement
 with the United States, you should not make it easier for you to
be sent to one of their jails.

In the short-term, I predict a slow trickle away from US registrars. Now,
that’s an interesting business opportunity for countries around the world…

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div class="post-meta fix">	

							<div class="post-header fix post-nothumb" style>
																<div class="post-title-section fix">

									<div class="post-title fix">

										<h1 class="entry-title">Domain name seizures: The end of the dotcom \
dominance?</h1> <div class="metabar"><em><span class="sword"><a \
href="http://www.technollama.co.uk/domain-name-seizures-the-end-of-the-dotcom-dominanc \
e">http://www.technollama.co.uk/domain-name-seizures-the-end-of-the-dotcom-dominance</a><br>

By</span> <span class="author vcard"><span class="fn"><a \
href="http://www.technollama.co.uk/author/admin" title="Posts by Andres" \
rel="author">Andres</a></span></span> <span class="sword">On</span> <span class="date \
time published" title="2012-02-22T05:37:55-0600">February 22, 2012</span>  · <span \
class="post-comments"><a \
href="http://www.technollama.co.uk/domain-name-seizures-the-end-of-the-dotcom-dominance#comments">Leave \
a Comment</a></span>  </em></div>

									</div>

								</div>
															</div>				
						</div>

								<p style="text-align:center"><a \
href="http://www.technollama.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Dot-Com-bubble.jpg"><img \
class=" wp-image-5107 aligncenter" title="Dot-Com-bubble" \
src="http://www.technollama.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Dot-Com-bubble.jpg" \
alt="" height="363" width="471"></a></p>

Back in November 2011 the US Department of Justice <a \
href="http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2011/November/11-ag-1540.html" \
target="_blank">announced its continuing</a> program of domain name seizures under \
the authority of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency. At the same \
time, ICE removed the domain from 150 sites allegedly infringing copyright. Back \
then, I felt that this would be a big development in the ongoing War on Piracy. Then \
 we were hit with the Megaupload arrests, an important part of which was 
the seizure of its .com domain by US authorities using existing powers.
Last week we saw another incredible example of domain name seizure when JotForm, a \
free web-based WYSIWYG form builder, <a \
href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2012/02/secret-service-asks-for-shutdown-of-legit-website-over-user-content-godaddy-complies.ars?clicked=related_right" \
target="_blank">had its .com domain redirected</a> by GoDaddy under request of the \
US Secret Service. It is believed that this was done because some people were using \
the service for phishing, but that is besides the point. What is really interesting \
is that the domain take-down has become the latest weapon in the US regulator 
arsenal, and it seems like registrars are more than willing to comply 
with any order, even if it is not judicial.
This has lots of worrying implications, but I believe that there must
 be growing concern amongst legitimate businesses around the world about
 the viability of keeping a .com domain name, specially if the business 
has any sort of involvement with users and user-generated content. It is
 clear that sites which engage in copyright infringing are starting to 
migrate outside of the US, with The Pirate Bay being the most prominent 
example when it moved to a .se domain. But should legitimate operators 
do the same? The answer to me is yes. With the presence of trigger-happy
 law enforcement agencies running amok in the US with the domain name 
system, I cannot see how an international business would endanger its 
name by keeping a .com name. Sure, they were useful once, but in the age
 of Google their importance is overstated, and it doesn’t really matter 
anymore if your domain is .co, .ly or .ca. It seems clear that keeping a
 domain with a US-based registrar may open one to have any domain seized
 with little or no prior notification, and with no apparent legal 
recourse.
Similarly, a big concern for any business should be that by keeping a
 domain name in a US registrar could also be the equivalent of signing 
up to American jurisdiction. Needless to say, if your country has an <a \
href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2087135/Richard-ODwyer-US-extradition-pact-misused-says-Sir-Menzies-Campbell.html" \
target="_blank">unfairly harsh extradition</a> agreement with the United States, you \
should not make it easier for you to be sent to one of their jails.

In the short-term, I predict a slow trickle away from US registrars. 
Now, that’s an interesting business opportunity for countries around the
 world…

_______________________________________________
AfrICANN mailing list
AfrICANN@afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/africann

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 