[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       activemq-users
Subject:    Re: Odd network of broker behavior with 5.8
From:       Oleg Dulin  <oleg.dulin () gmail ! com>
Date:       2013-07-25 21:14:17
Message-ID: kss4f2$8f1$1 () ger ! gmane ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Yes, I am reconfiguring my environment and going to set up a test 
situation again.

I'll keep you posted, thanks!

On 2013-07-22 23:08:40 +0000, Christian Posta said:

> --089e0160c406d911ae04e221c15a
> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> 
> 
> can you take a stack trace of the broker when it gets into that state?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Oleg Dulin 
> <oleg.dulin@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > I have two brokers set up on two servers. One is 10.194.2.1, the other is
> 
> > 10.194.2.2 .
> 
> >
> 
> > One of them has this in its config file:
> 
> >
> 
> >          <networkConnectors>
> 
> >                         <networkConnector name="2.1"
> 
> >                                  
> uri="static:(tcp://10.194.2.1:**3000<http://10.194.2.1:3000>)"
> 
> >  duplex="true" />
> 
> >                 </networkConnectors>
> 
> >
> 
> > I have clients connecting to these two brokers using "failover" schema,
> 
> > i.e. failover:(tcp://10.194.2.1:**3000 <http://10.194.2.1:3000>,tcp://
> 
> > 10.194.2.2:3000)
> 
> >
> 
> > The clients start and end through out the day. They are desktop
> 
> > applications for the most part.
> 
> >
> 
> > What we are observing is very odd behavior with 10.194.2.1 (we think
> 
> > that's the one). What seems to happen is that after awhile it either stops
> 
> > accepting client connections, stops handlings the queues and topics. No
> 
> > exceptions are thrown, nothing out of ordinary, it just simply hangs in
> 
> > there when someone tries to establish a connection, and when publishing
> 
> > messages it accepts them but doesn't forward them to consumers.
> 
> >
> 
> > I switched the setup temporarily to a single message broker. That
> 
> > alleviated the symptoms.
> 
> >
> 
> > However, I need to move this back to a 2-broker setup ASAP.
> 
> >
> 
> > Am I doing something wrong ? Would be better off using two connections as
> 
> > opposed to duplex ?
> 
> >
> 
> > Any thoughts are greatly appreciated.
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > --
> 
> > Regards,
> 
> > Oleg Dulin
> 
> > http://www.olegdulin.com
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> *Christian Posta*
> 
> http://www.christianposta.com/blog
> 
> twitter: @christianposta
> 
> 
> 
> --089e0160c406d911ae04e221c15a--
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Regards,
Oleg Dulin
http://www.olegdulin.com


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]