[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       activemq-users
Subject:    Re: ActiveMQ vs. Camel vs. Qpid
From:       James Strachan <james.strachan () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-08-26 11:24:08
Message-ID: AANLkTimE4dpsBGcVB6w5-tzgiy=Xx0qJm=mTCD-QTDyF () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 26 August 2010 11:53, heapifyman <heapifyman@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am quite new to the whole messaging thing and I am a bit confused about
> the differences between ActiveMQ, Camel and Qpid. Especially, which tool
> would be suited best for which scenarios?

To specifically answer this part of your question; if you want to
integrate stuff together - whether the stuff comes from files,
databases, message brokers, web services or whatever, I'd recommend
Camel. Its what its great for.

If you want

* to connect your systems together using a high performance reliable
message broker
* a reliable & high performance load balancing (with optional
persistence & transactions) of requests across your services
* to disseminate business events across your systems using a variety
of protocols like OpenWire / Stomp / REST / WebSockets

then I'd recommend ActiveMQ.

-- 
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/

Open Source Integration
http://fusesource.com/
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]