[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       activemq-dev
Subject:    Re: [DISCUSS] Naming convention for official Docker images
From:       Jean-Baptiste_Onofré <jb () nanthrax ! net>
Date:       2023-07-11 4:53:53
Message-ID: CAB8EV3TnCTEkxXJu4spNWp_rLYJEMVdPy3hiD3rjVOLSf4uM_Q () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Thanks all, I will rename apache/activemq to apache/activemq-classic.

Regards
JB

On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 3:57 PM Justin Bertram <jbertram@apache.org> wrote:
>
> This weekend JB announced [1] the availability of official Docker images
> for ActiveMQ "Classic" in the "apache/activemq" namespace [2].
>
> Perhaps I missed it, but I don't recall (and can't find) any discussion of
> or notification about this. Users will certainly expect images for both
> "Classic" and Artemis so my concern is regarding the namespace. If both
> "Classic" and Artemis share the apache/activemq namespace directly then
> there may eventually be version number conflicts and there certainly will
> be confusion about which version is which.
>
> Before these images are widely adopted I think the namespace should be
> clarified just as it is on the website so that ActiveMQ "Classic" uses
> "apache/activemq/classic" and ActiveMQ Artemis uses
> "apache/activemq/artemis".
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> Justin
>
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/4cqbm0gsbj184vrp13yorcd2rrbdcsmx
> [2] https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/activemq/tags
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]