[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       activemq-dev
Subject:    Re: Activemq and problematic language
From:       JB_Onofré <jb () nanthrax ! net>
Date:       2021-07-08 19:40:55
Message-ID: 0FB38388-BBBA-4473-8AF9-50393EAB8A11 () nanthrax ! net
[Download RAW message or body]


Thanks Etienne. 

In any case, such kind of change is breaking change for the users. 

Fortunately, in ActiveMQ, we mostly have to update the document: the activemq xml \
doesn't contain lot of problematic wording. 

Regards 
JB

> Le 8 juil. 2021 à 21:33, Hossack, Etienne <ehossack@amazon.com.invalid> a écrit :
> 
>  Hi Rich,
> 
> I can't speak for the PMC and in particular for the progress made on Artemis, but \
> for 5.X I can offer the following: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7514 \
> was created to address the terminology used within ActiveMQ The mainline branch for \
> both repositories is now "main" You reminded me to open a PR with some of the \
> configuration changes/logging as outlined in phase 1. 
> There's definitely more work to be done, and I'm personally happy to step up and \
> take a more active effort in driving the changes forward within the project. 
> Look forward to hearing from the committers!
> 
> Étienne Hossack
> Software Development Engineer, Amazon MQ
> email: ehossack@amazon.com
> 
> 
> 
> > On Jul 8, 2021, at 11:48 AM, Rich Bowen <rbowen@apache.org> wrote:
> > 
> > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click \
> > links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content \
> > is safe. 
> > 
> > 
> > Hi, folks,
> > 
> > Back in November I sent email to this list [1] about usage of words such as \
> > master, slave, blacklist, etc, in the Activemq project. My impression is that, \
> > since that time, you have made considerable progress on those changes. I was \
> > wondering if you could tell me where we are in this? 
> > I have noticed that more and more projects are getting to a point here they can \
> > no longer make further progress because word uses are dictated by \
> > upstream/dependencies/standards over which they have no direct influence. Is that \
> > where you've landed, or is this still an ongoing effort? 
> > Thanks for any info.
> > 
> > --Rich
> > 
> > 
> > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r2c7b11a07f136fa417cdb5e64c443aa52dc7d0f66c4b9f9ceb9445fa%40%3Cdev.activemq.apache.org%3E
> > 
> 



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]