[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: activemq-dev
Subject: Re: [ANN] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.1 has been released!
From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb () nanthrax ! net>
Date: 2021-02-13 4:29:18
Message-ID: 54CC7EFB-CC07-42A3-90E5-E1CC03FD13DC () nanthrax ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
Hi,
Thanks for the update.
First, I propose to start a new thread about that.
A separated repository for the docker file is not required: it depends if we want to \
push directly from the build or not. At Karaf, the docker file is part of the "main" \
repo, and the image publication is part of the release process (manually):
https://github.com/apache/karaf/tree/master/assemblies/docker \
<https://github.com/apache/karaf/tree/master/assemblies/docker>
Using the activemq repository, you can create a PR directly on it. Anyway, I already \
have couple of Dockerfiles ready (depending of the topology). I can create the PR and \
give the ball to you if you wanna try/improve. Up to you.
About the JDK base image, my Dockerfiles are based on AdoptOpenJDK: it works fine \
with ActiveMQ.
Regards
JB
> Le 12 févr. 2021 à 20:57, Shank, Charles R <SHANKC1@nationwide.com> a écrit :
>
> Good afternoon
>
> MY co-worker and I have created a github repository \
> https://github.com/shankc1crs/docker-activemq
> We will be working on this repo on Monday and feel free to watch our progress. We \
> have found the 2 jdk options we will be working with
> AdoptOpenJDK: https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/openjdk-docker
>
> Which will include the following
> debian, debian-slim, apline
>
> or
> OpenJDK: https://github.com/docker-library/openjdk
>
> Which will include
> debian, debian-slim
>
>
> we also feel for an official image a separate repo will be necessary for the \
> docker-file
> Thank you
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb@nanthrax.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2021 12:35 AM
> To: dev@activemq.apache.org
> Cc: Shank, Charles R <SHANKC1@nationwide.com>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ANN] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.1 has been released!
>
> Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL email. Use CAUTION \
> before clicking on links, opening attachments, or responding. (Sender: \
> jb@nanthrax.net)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Hi Lucas,
>
> Thanks for your feedback.
>
> At Karaf, docker file is part of the same repository as codebase. That's true I'm \
> pushing image with scripts when I do a release.
> You are right about "splitting" release: we can push a new docker image whereas the \
> code didn't change (and of course the opposite). It's really rare (the docker image \
> should be pretty stable), but you are right, it can happen.
> We can create a dedicated repo for activemq-docker, that's not a problem. We should \
> just be careful to keep releases sync together ;)
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 10 févr. 2021 à 06:26, Tetreault, Lucas <tetlucas@amazon.com.INVALID> a \
> > écrit :
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > I don't think that keeping the docker file and supporting code in the same \
> > codebase as ActiveMQ is a good idea. There will be problems managing tags for \
> > releases and docker images in the same repository and you will end up including \
> > fixes for unrelated docker containers in newer releases. The accepted best \
> > practice seems to be a separate repository. Something in the Apache namespace on \
> > GitHub is definitely sufficient to establish the trust that it is the official \
> > docker image or you could pursue creating an official docker image \
> > (https://docs.docker.com/docker-hub/official_images/#creating-an-official-image) \
> > which are hosted in the https://github.com/docker-library namespace and of course \
> > must be separate from the codebase.
> > Thanks,
> > Lucas Tétreault
> >
> > On 2021-02-08, 10:23 AM, "Matt Pavlovich" <mattrpav@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click \
> > links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content \
> > is safe.
> >
> >
> > Got it. I'll get a PR for an initial activemq-docker module for 5.17.x pushed \
> > out.
> > Thanks,
> > -Matt
> >
> > > On Feb 8, 2021, at 11:25 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Matt,
> > >
> > > My preference would be to have a module in the codebase. It would "secure" the \
> > > link between docker image and the actual code.
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > > > Le 8 févr. 2021 à 17:22, Matt Pavlovich <mattrpav@gmail.com> a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > JB/Charles-
> > > >
> > > > We have some parameterized configs we can pitch in as well. I was thinking a \
> > > > separate repo would make sense, vs a module within the main tree. Easier for \
> > > > users to clone and customize.
> > > > Thoughts?
> > > > [ ] Separate activemq-docker repo
> > > > [ ] Add module to main ‘activemq' tree
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > > -Matt Pavlovich
> > > >
> > > > > On Feb 5, 2021, at 10:45 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Of course a discussion is always welcome.
> > > > >
> > > > > To answer to your first question:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Alpine is fine IMHO for ActiveMQ (lighter).
> > > > > 2. Java 8 for ActiveMQ 5.15.x, Java 11 based image for ActiveMQ
> > > > > 5.16.x+ 3. The ActiveMQ Jira is there:
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/AMQ/issues/AMQ-7229?filter=
> > > > > allopenissues
> > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/AMQ/issues/AMQ-7229?filter
> > > > > =allopenissues> I can create a component Docker on Jira.
> > > > >
> > > > > IMHO, the docker image should use env variables to pass configuration (in \
> > > > > activemq.xml), and we should provide README.md with some important \
> > > > > information (I'm thinking the filesystem to use on some cloud provider, \
> > > > > like EFS on AWS, etc). By the way, I also have a Dockerfile for my \
> > > > > production system (on Azure and AWS).
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > JB
> > > > >
> > > > > > Le 5 févr. 2021 à 21:45, Shank, Charles R <SHANKC1@nationwide.com> a \
> > > > > > écrit :
> > > > > >
> > > > > > JB,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The dockerfile and image that we currently have available is specific to \
> > > > > > Nationwide. What I would like to propose is to have a community \
> > > > > > discussion on the requirements so a generic docker image could be created \
> > > > > > that would benefit the whole ActiveMQ community.
> > > > > > For example:
> > > > > > Do we build it using Debian or alpine?
> > > > > > Java version?
> > > > > > Items like this - also where does the jira board for ActiveMQ reside?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I look forward to working with you and the others in the ActiveMQ
> > > > > > community
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank you in advance
> > > > > > Chuck Shank
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb@nanthrax.net>
> > > > > > Sent: Friday, February 05, 2021 11:55 AM
> > > > > > To: dev@activemq.apache.org
> > > > > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ANN] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.1 has been released!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL
> > > > > > email. Use CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachments,
> > > > > > or responding. (Sender:
> > > > > > dev-return-72165-SHANKC1=nationwide.com@activemq.apache.org)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > ------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Awesome !
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do you already have a Dockerfile ready ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > JB
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Le 5 févr. 2021 à 17:52, Shank, Charles R <SHANKC1@nationwide.com> a \
> > > > > > > écrit :
> > > > > > > Nationwide would like to be involved in creating a standard image
> > > > > > > that could be used by the open source community for ActiveMQ
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb@nanthrax.net>
> > > > > > > Sent: Friday, February 05, 2021 11:49 AM
> > > > > > > To: dev@activemq.apache.org
> > > > > > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [ANN] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.1 has been released!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL
> > > > > > > email. Use CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachments,
> > > > > > > or responding. (Sender:
> > > > > > > dev-return-72163-SHANKC1=nationwide.com@activemq.apache.org)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > -------------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We don't have "official" Apache image \
> > > > > > > (https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/activemq \
> > > > > > > <https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/activemq>).
> > > > > > > I create such image for Apache Karaf \
> > > > > > > (https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/karaf \
> > > > > > > <https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/karaf>).
> > > > > > > Maybe we can create a Jira about that and start something about that.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thoughts ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > JB
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Le 5 févr. 2021 à 17:45, Shank, Charles R <SHANKC1@nationwide.com> \
> > > > > > > > a écrit :
> > > > > > > > Good morning, I appreciate the emails I have been receiving - I would \
> > > > > > > > like to know if there is a standard docker image of ActiveMQ that is \
> > > > > > > > used by the AMQ community that is used in a kubernetes container?
> > > > > > > > Thank you
> > > > > > > > Chuck Shank
> > > > > > > > Nationwide Insurance
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb@nanthrax.net>
> > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, February 05, 2021 11:38 AM
> > > > > > > > To: dev@activemq.apache.org; user@activemq.apache.org
> > > > > > > > Cc: announce@apache.org
> > > > > > > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [ANN] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.1 has been released!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL
> > > > > > > > email. Use CAUTION before clicking on links, opening
> > > > > > > > attachments, or responding. (Sender:
> > > > > > > > dev-return-72161-SHANKC1=nationwide.com@activemq.apache.org)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > > --------------
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.1 \
> > > > > > > > release.
> > > > > > > > http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-5161-release
> > > > > > > > <http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-5161-release>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This release includes updates, and improvements, especially:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > - Fix on the runtime configuration plugin, allowing to work with
> > > > > > > > both JDK8 and JDK9+
> > > > > > > > - Prefetch & invalid certificate warnings now include details
> > > > > > > > about the client
> > > > > > > > - bunch of dependency updates, addressing third party fixes and
> > > > > > > > CVE
> > > > > > > > - new simple logout link on admin console
> > > > > > > > - improved Apache Karaf features
> > > > > > > > - and much more !
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Enjoy !
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > > —
> > > > > > > > The ActiveMQ Team
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic