[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       activemq-dev
Subject:    Use Apache ActiveMQ Artemis JDBC Persistence for production
From:       Benjamin Graf <benjamin.graf () gmx ! net>
Date:       2018-03-20 17:18:21
Message-ID: b03cb6d7-ca82-de34-a144-0547853c8543 () gmx ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/mixed)]


Hi Clemens,

I would still call it experimental. IMHO ARTEMIS-545 still needs to be
addressed especially for EAP where DS pools are managed.

@all: Does performance test cases exist for JDBC backend like for
regular journal?

Regards,

Benjamin

Am 20.03.2018 um 16:54 schrieb Andy Taylor:
> If your using EAP I would raise this thru the Red Hat support channels.=

>
> On 20 March 2018 at 09:26, swclhard <clemens.harder@gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> So does anybody know about the state of JDBC persistence for Artemis? =
Is it
>> still experimental like written in the documentation?
>>
>> We have analyzed EAP 7.1 with Artemis. Here we have explicit support o=
nly
>> for Oracle12C and no warning in the documentation.
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Clemens
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-
>> f2368404.html
>>





["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]