[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       activemq-dev
Subject:    Re: [DISCUSS] Rework NMS.AMQP
From:       Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic () gmail ! com>
Date:       2017-02-28 15:11:55
Message-ID: CAKF+bsq8FMoOxc0azrorJ8Q9xfYwuPfhOQ9GhqD5JWeoR2_VRg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

that's probably a question for Legal.

I would think you need both...

I am not a lawyer.. but usually employees will have a contract with
the company you were hired from. So if you are doing this during your
day job you probably need a corporate agreement to release any of the
company's IP as an open source contribution????...... don't take that
as a legal advice :)


I think it would be safer to fill both.. but ask the question on the
legal list just in case.



On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Duane Pauls <duane.pauls@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I think u still need to fill a contributors agreement
>
> Does anyone know if there is a practical difference between the individual
> CLA and the corporate CLA?  Or do they both accomplish the same goal
> equally?
>
> Cheers,
> Duane



-- 
Clebert Suconic
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]